Category: astrology (Page 1 of 2)

Post US Election 2024

As I predicted on my November 2024 predictions, Trump won the election. So I decided to make this post to talk a bit more about the whys and also discuss the energy around the election too.

Trump Election and the Trends

Those that follow my work regularly know that I’ve been publishing articles on the long term prospects of the world. It’s something I decided to do since I believe we are in the cusp of great change, with the major astrological aspects of the coming years showing that.

I mention this because many of the Vedic astrologers who predicted the Trump win as well mention great transits in his chart as a main factor. I similarly considered those and, yes, they are important. But to me, the decisive factor in making this prediction was the long term outlook of the world. As I wrote in my prediction:

Looking at the transits around and specially after the election, a lot tends to align with his political messages and the policy around him.

In September, I published about Saturn conjunct Neptune. This aspect deals a lot with our cultural perception of the world and social trends, relating a lot to the mythos around society. It happens every 36 years, having last occurred around 1989.

If we look at the world, much of our current culture is derived from the events in the early 90s, when the last conjunction occurred. That was a conjunction in Sagittarius. The sign deals with travel, expansion, laws, regulations; as well as an outspoken and feisty streak.

Since the late 90s up until this day, immigration and the integration of foreign cultures has only expanded. Bureaucratic boards and regulations have similarly increased, with the EU being the greatest example. Celebrities are mostly outspoken and focused on shock and awe.

In the 80s and before, most celebrities tried remaining neutral and diplomatic. Taking a stand was reserved for those with powerful and long careers. The outspoken ones were few and vastly criticized. Nowadays, we have the opposite. Few celebrities try to remain neutral, and they are criticized for it.

That was the Sagittarius impulse, which wanes more and more as we approach the new conjunction in Pisces next year.

I specifically mention celebrities, as celebrity culture was a big thing of the Sagittarius cycle. In politics, celebrity endorsements used to be powerful. Initiatives from the 90s like Rock The Vote were a clear example of this. Look at us now. Harris was endorsed by most, and the biggest, celebrities around. It made almost no difference. The celebrity age of Sagittarius is over.

Which brings us back to my main point, on why I saw the mundane trends favoring Trump more than Harris.

Harris is a lawyer and bureaucrat. She wanted to maintain immigration and foreign collaboration. All Sagittarius matters. Her imagery in the campaign was centered around sassy and outspoken behavior. Again, a very Sagittarius thing.

Along with Kamala is Brat, a big thing of the campaign was bringing people like Dick Cheney (of the Iraq War) to show how even Republicans were against Trump. War bureaucrats of the past. In many ways, her campaign was doused in Sagittarius imagery.

On the other side, Trump’s message became even stronger against immigration. He talked about reducing bureaucracy and regulations. He had an anti-war messaging, which we all should hope remains true. In many ways, his campaign was the anti-Sagittarius. A very ironic turn of events for someone who rose to fame in the 90s, by being the exact kind of outspoken character favored by that sign.

Also worth mentioning that Trump brought idealistic and somewhat coy people, like RFK Jr. and Elon Musk, into the campaign. Idealistic, yet shy, is something seen through Pisces. The sign of the 2025 Saturn-Neptune conjunction. So not only did the campaign shun the waning influences, it aligned itself with the rising ones.

On that note, Kamala is Bush. The father, not the son. Considering the Saturn-Neptune conjunctions, this election mirrors the 1992 election. It happened around the Saturn-Neptune conjunction in Sagittarius, as the world moved on from the Virgo conjunctions in 1953 and their influence.

Bush was a very Virgo character, his campaign was all about responsibility, cleanliness and maintaining the order. He lost to Bill Clinton, who ran a campaign about enthusiasm, youthfulness and economic improvement. Bush criticized Clinton for his lack of experience, making an appeal to those Virgo values that were waning culturally.

This time around, Trump was criticized for not caring about the social etiquette and moral philosophies of society, like diversity and inclusion. All Sagittarius values waning in society now, as we move into the new cycle.


Overall, Trump’s messaging aligned more with the trends I see rising with the major astrological events of the coming years, which is what motivated my prediction.

Election Day

The election day was very tense, with reports of nervousness from people on both sides of the contest. I have to admit, as someone who hates and criticizes the hyperbole of MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION EVER (always in caps lock), that this time it truly felt like it was. Hearing people talking, behaving, it truly was a significant moment. Something I felt lacking both in 2020 and 2016.

chart of Election Day

Looking at the chart above, a few things point to this. Starting from what every astrologer talked about, Mars opposing Pluto. An aspect of great tension and conflict. Some predicted great violence, riots and trouble. Which, to the best of my knowledge, has not happened. The 2016 Trump victory had a much bigger repercussion, on that sense, than this current one. On my prediction, I said that most of the protests would be ineffective and symbolical. Again, I seem to have gotten that prediction right.

But going back to that Election Day tension, it mostly comes from the Moon that day. Aspect wise the Moon sits exactly aligned with the Lunar Nodes, in the middle of them. With the Nodes being a karmic point, this indicates a day of tension and transformative events. I always look to planets sitting in the mid-point of the Lunar Nodes when making predictions, as it always denotes an intense moment. In the case of the Moon, an intense day.

Besides that, the Moon also made a square to Neptune, early in the day. Neptune relates to illusions, deception, dreams and imagination. The square shows those illusions being shattered or broken, creating a need for realignment.

The star of the show in the day’s tension, however, is the nakshatra of the Moon. Nakshatras are a specialty of mine, and a very important point of Vedic Astrology. The Moon sat on Mula nakshatra for most of Tuesday. This star is ruled by Niritti, the goddess of destruction. It deals a lot with uprooting, radical transformation and fierce energies. Natives born under this star tend to be rebels or outsiders. Events around Mula tend to leave a strong mark in the psyche.

In many ways, it was a day of tension and uprooting. People who liked the result had a whole day of tension, glued to their screens watching everything carefully. Many who disliked the result are feeling a strong shock right now.

In many countries, people believed Harris would win. A poll in Germany showed that 72% of people believed she would win the election. Needless to say, people around the world who believed their international correspondents were surprised by the results. Outside the US, most of the international press made it seem like Trump had zero chance and Harris was the perfect candidate, leading to the current shock and last minute adjustments around the world.

Overall, this was a classic Mula day. Shock, uprooting and transformation. The natural impulse of the nakshatra was strengthened by the other aspects of the day, maximizing the impact.

Questions, August 2024

Order and chaos, a few editorial questions and doubts about people and conversations.

See the previous Q&A here.

Only Talks Money

"what makes a person a golddigger who only talks about money ?"
Name: rosie

Short answer: Only talks about money? Probably a Scorpio.

Long answer:

The 3rd house represents what we tend to talk about. For instance, Leo loves talking about arts, movies and beauty. The third house is Libra, ruled by Venus, a sign that deals a lot with the fine and pretty things of life.

Similarly, all water signs have their third house being an earth sign. Earth is mainly concerned with stability, resources and money.

Cancer has practical Virgo as the 3rd house, so it talks a lot about getting things done. Pisces has Taurus, which is the sign of money, but Venus (ruler of Taurus) can steer things away; focusing more on arts and beauty.

Scorpio has business oriented Capricorn, and Scorpio naturally deals with the 8th house of other people’s money, so it all becomes money.

  • “he does this this and that, he also has that company that sells…”
  • “he has so much money, people can’t screw with him”
  • “he never loses money”

Those are all phrases I’ve heard in conversation with Scorpios. Whenever somebody gave me a financial rundown of a stranger’s life, I would always find a Scorpio Moon when approximating their birthday on my phone. The only time it wasn’t, it was a Scorpio Ascendant, the scorpioness showed me her birthtime.

I really don’t understand the allure of it. To me, the only money that matters is the one I can use. If I can’t turn it into coffee, booze and debauchery, it is irrelevant money in my book.

But the cuddly scorpions love this subject, and they love steering conversations towards it. I’ve recently been in a conversation, originally about cats and dogs, that became about some random youtuber’s finances. All thanks to a Scorpio. I will never understand it. I would rather give a colonoscopy to a dog than discuss some random youtube-person’s money, but hey, some people are into it. Scorpios.

On that note, if you want to approach a Scorpio, having gossip about some rando’s finances is a good ice-breaker.

Pisces

"youre very negative about pisces"
Name: nienke

Short answer: No, I don’t think so.

Long answer:

In my writings and studies, I always like to go against the grain, even if just a little, to balance out the excesses and issues in the consensus. There is always nuance, and nuance is always lost when you reach a consensus. Why? Because people start repeating the same phrases and statements, but without the proper background knowledge.

On signs, a lot of the mainstream pop astrology opinions on them come from a woman named Linda Goodman — I covered her biography briefly on my Revati text. The thing is a lot of people nowadays have no idea who she is, yet they still repeat her ideas, why?

Because people learned from her, made their own derivative works, and the world moved on. A mom read a pop astrology book in the 90s, based on Linda’s book from the 60s. Her daughter read a Tumblr post in 2014, based on a 2005 website, based on that 90s book. This will all lead to a TikTok, which will inspire the next generation.

With signs, we have a general consensus that tends to demonize certain signs, like Aries and Gemini. And sanctify others like Pisces and Aquarius. Why?

Aquarius is said to represent astrology, and a lot of western astrologers are born under tropical Aquarius. So there is this bias. But that isn’t the actual main reason.

Some astrologers believe that each sign shows a higher point of human evolution. With Aquarius and Pisces being the last signs, they are seen as holy and superior influences. This comes mostly from Esoteric Astrology, from the times of Madame Blavatsky.

Similarly to the Linda — poor old Linda, she was a fine lady, I would have had a glass of wine with her — situation above, a lot of people repeat Esoteric Astrology lore, without having read or even heard about it. Again, the derivative works, the beat goes on, etc.

My opinion? I’ve met the scum of the earth, and angels too, of all signs. I don’t buy the holiness of Pisces. Sorry, I am not sorry.

I will keep writing the complicated, weird, negative and bad side of Pisces — and everything else, for that matter. It exists, it needs to be discussed, and it helps people.

I’ve received feedback on some of my Nakshatra texts, people identifying with the negative sides, and finding some sense of peace. Understanding why they tend to act in certain manners, can be key to dealing with it. An Anuradha lady told me she finally understood why she kept so many bad friends around.

Back to Pisces, the sign has more defects and issues than “loving too much”, as some tend to say. And I will write about them. As long as a meteor doesn’t kill me, I will write about it. To those used to the ass-kissing and “they are so evolved”, it will sound unfair, not much I can do about it.

Ketu in the 2nd house transit

"what does ketu in 2nd house transit mean?i read it can show poverty"
Name: 宇轩

Ketu’s transit shows an area of detachment, where we are letting go and releasing ourselves from something. For instance, in the 1st house or with the Moon, it can show letting go of personal blockages. Letting go of a fear, a limitation, etc. Someone scared of public speaking could decide to let go, and face their fear, for example.

The 2nd house denotes money, finances, keeping and storing resources. Ketu’s letting go certainly doesn’t sound attractive here. Letting go of “keeping resources” can mean spending more money, instead of saving it.

In my experience, this is usually the time when people tend to make extravagant purchases or more lavish expenses. Getting a new phone, new TV, new car, etc.

Specially with people who tend to save money, this can be a surprising time looking back. As you spend your whole life saving, putting up with old stuff to avoid spending, and suddenly you don’t bother letting go and using your money.

For people who spend money carelessly already, this transit will exacerbate that, so they should try finding someone to advise them — or even nanny them — to avoid breaking the bank.

But overall, for the average person, this transit will show increased expenses. Usually pleasurable or desirable for them. A slight dent, or lack of growth, in their savings. But nothing radical like poverty.

Order and Chaos

"in what order are you publishhing the nakshatras? im curious"
Name: blue

Short answer: Order? There is no order, just chaos.

Long answer:

When I started this site, I planned on publishing them in the vanilla order. My first two published ones were Ashwini and Bharani. Then I had to go into Krittika, and I got slightly annoyed with following the order. So I ended up going: Ashwini, Bharani, Ashlesha, Swati, Purva Phalguni, Ardra, Uttara Bhadrapada, Magha, Uttara Phalguni, Hasta [actually followed the order here, but not intentionally], Purva Bhadrapada, Revati, Krittika, Anuradha, Shatabishak, Mula, Punarvasu and Vishakha this month.

Completely out of order. After the first two, I just decided to do “the one I felt like doing” at a particular moment. And I find it a great decision!

My process in writing these texts is flipping through my messy notes on each of these nakshatras, and turning them into something that other people can read and understand, unlike my notes. I usually write one every month, sometimes more, sometimes less.

Vishakha is kinda of a frozen lasagna in that sense. July was a hectic month for me, as sadly August has also been, so I couldn’t really get going with the nakshatra I had decided on doing. But earlier in the year, I made Vishakha as an extra. It came in really handy now.

On the bumped nakshatra of August, it is funny to me. Because it isn’t the first time I’ve bumped it. This is either the second or third bump. Bummer, specially because I’m considering doing other nakshatras instead of the bumped one now. I felt like doing it, I no longer feel like doing it.

But I think this lack of order is great, for a few reasons.

The first point is the reality of people and astrology. Give someone a book, or reference, what is the first thing they will check? Their own placements. If they are a Cancer, they will check Cancer first. If they are a Sagittarius, it will be Sagittarius. If they are Revati, it will be Revati. People want to see their own first, without much care for the order.

“I wrote this in the most beautiful and perfect order”, cute, but people will just read their own thing first.

The second point is lazy writing and school-teacher-esque writing. As we recall from the last class. As we recall from the last lecture. As we saw in the last one. Those recollection devices that assume you saw all the lectures. I don’t like to assume that. As we recall. Who is we? I cut class that day to read an astrology book. I also have no desire to be a part of a we involving you!

As explained above, people will just read their own thing first. So if you assumed they read the previous one, you assumed wrong. They don’t have the knowledge you expect them to have.

I hate these assumptions and literary devices, I avoid them like the plague. I like to use informed comparisons instead. I compare, I link to a previous text, but I give a short explanation of why the comparison. Even if you haven’t read the text, you can still understand it.

Reading in whichever messy order it pleases you, you will still be able to understand it. Because one text doesn’t rely on another one to be understood. And that is a great thing.

Charts are rarely orderly. Many times they are messy, with conflicting influences. Getting used to finding order, in a lack of order, is an essential skill to any astrologer. I think I do a good job in teaching that.


I got no questions from Lasagna this time, I miss Lasagna.

« Older posts

© 2025 Nexus Astrology

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑